When a leader claims genocide was “civilization”… he is not talking about the past.
Recently, Vice President JD Vance stood on a stage and said this:
“Settlers found widespread child sacrifice in the New World.
Christian civilization ended the practice.”
This isn’t a historical slip.
It’s a strategic narrative, carefully chosen.
Why?
Because if you can convince people that Indigenous nations were monstrous —
then the violence done to them becomes righteous, even humanitarian.
This is not about the 1400s.
It’s about what a U.S. administration believes it has the moral right to do now.
🚨 This is genocide staging — in public
Dr. Gregory Stanton’s Ten Stages of Genocide exist to identify danger early.
Vance just checked off four of them in one breath.
Stage 3 — Dehumanization
Cast Indigenous peoples as child-killers, inherently depraved.
Stage 4 — Organization
Portray “Christian civilization” as the rescuing superior race/culture.
Stage 5 — Polarization
Draw a moral line:
we save children — they destroyed them.
Stage 6 — Preparation
Implies that domination was (and remains) necessary “for their own good.”
This is not education.
This is normalizing the ideology that made genocide possible.
🧩 The same lie lives in QAnon
QAnon didn’t invent this tactic.
It simply modernized it.
Their core story is identical:
The enemy hides among us
They harm children
Only the movement can save them
Any brutality is justified as rescue
It’s not politics — it’s a holy war narrative.
Once your opponents are framed as child killers,
democracy becomes immoral.
Violence becomes duty.
🧩 And Russia is using it to justify atrocities in Ukraine
Russia invaded Ukraine not with logic — but with lies:
Ukraine is a nest of “child abusers”
Russia must rescue the children
Deportations are framed as protection
Cultural erasure is branded as civilization
The UN has already flagged genocidal intent in those deportations.
These narratives do not justify war.
They justify removing a people from history.
🔗 The connective thread
Colonizers.
QAnon.
The Kremlin.
Different eras.
Same story structure:
Invent a child-killing enemy →
Create moral panic →
Authorize cruelty in the name of care.
When a sitting Vice President adopts that narrative —
it moves from meme to state ideology.
❗This is the point where history usually looks away
Vance isn’t talking about Indigenous history by accident.
He is rewriting it with praise for the perpetrators.
He is reframing genocide as salvation.
We didn’t steal, we saved.
We didn’t murder, we rescued.
We didn’t destroy, we civilized.
That is the moral license that allows:
more raids
more camps
more disappearances
more deaths at sea
more families torn apart “for safety”
Not mistakes — policy directions.
When the executive branch sanctifies domination,
the targets are already chosen.
✋ Call this what it is
Not ignorance.
Not clumsy history.
Not a misfired talking point.
It is the revival of the foundational American justification for genocide —
now pointed at the future.
We are being told a story:
Some cultures are less human.
Some families are less worthy.
Some people must be saved from themselves — by force.
And like every story of this kind,
it ends in silence where other people’s homes used to be.
If you care about truth, about Indigenous sovereignty, about Ukrainian survival,
about the right of children to stay with their families —
name this lie when you hear it.
Speak plainly.
Share widely.
Don’t let this narrative take deeper root.




A relevant interview here, which I wish wasn't relevant.
"Within Genocide Studies, there’s been a slow movement with internal genocide research. Dirk Moses has been leading it for a while, shifting the purview on what they look at to mass violence more broadly, because if you look at the Holocaust, it wasn’t like a flip was switched. It was a meandering, gradual process where lots of things happened, but by the time you get to the actual implementation of the plan. So, again, I’m not even thinking, is genocide about to take place in the U.S.?"
https://open.substack.com/pub/cryn/p/a-conversation-with-author-and-scholar
“You shall not Pass” Gandorf. They want the land in our national parks. Especially Alaska . Inuit pay close attention to our people.